Di Lorenzo on Mortgage Market Reforms

Vincent Di Lorenzo’s article, “Barriers to Market Discipline: A Comparative Study of Mortgage Market Reforms,” has been accepted for publication in the Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law. The article explores the types of regulatory reforms being considered in various nations and the likelihood that they will help us avoid a repetition of the unsafe lending practices that led to the current mortgage crisis. The following is an abstract of the article:

 This article explores regulatory reforms in response to the recent mortgage market crisis. First, the article explores the extent to which regulatory bodies have recognized behavioral barriers to market discipline on the part of both consumers and industry actors. The academic literature has long identified such barriers, but recognition by government regulators has lagged.  Without such recognition legal requirements and regulatory policies evolve without consideration of a major influence on human decision making.  Second the article examines the varied response in the U.S. and U.K. to both market limitations and behavioral limitations to self-protection and self-discipline that led to unsafe lending practices in the period 2003 through 2007. The greater emphasis on rules-based regulation in the U.S. after 2008 is compared with the continued reliance primarily on principles-based regulation in the U.K. This difference, however, is not what will determine future outcomes. Rather, the main finding is that future compliance with safety and soundness requirements will depend on a regulatory policy and enforcement record that will alter the industry’s risk assessment.  Past regulatory policies and enforcement record in most countries led industry actors to conclude that evasion, or even noncompliance, with legal requirements is a reasonable business decision based on cost-benefit evaluations. In light of that finding, the U.K.’s new enforcement policy and record, explored in this article, is far more likely to lead to compliance than the light-touch enforcement policy and record that has continued in the U.S.

 You can download the article here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: